Legal Opinion

Porter v. Gray

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 1946No. 11084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The administrator appeals from a judgment awarding him the exact amount of overcharges in the sale of red cedar shingles found by the district court to be due because Gray had overcharged in violation of Section 1381.4 a and b of the Price Regulations and a later provision 1381.4 c. The overcharges are later considered and found to have been correctly adjudicated. The evidence shows that Gray has not maintained his burden of proof that his violations of either order were not wilful. On the contrary, the court finds the specific facts constituting willfulness in violating…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. Bowles v. GoebelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Bowles v. KrodelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  4. Speten v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. Glick Bros. Lumber Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Porter v. Sunshine Packing Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Price v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Sheffield v. Jefferson Parish DevelopersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Brannon v. GargottaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API