Williams v. State

The evidence in behalf of the State authorized the conclusion reached by the' jury, that the defendant was guilty of-carrying a pistol concealed; and, as the motion for new trial rests upon the single ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, there was no error in refusing a new trial, although the defendant, by his statement, contradicted the witness in behalf of the State. The real question presented in the brief and the argu*34ment is, that the evidence of the defendant’s guilt, having been obtained after his person had been illegally arrested, is inadmissible and illegal, and…