Sabarof v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This is an appeal, under the Act of April 26, 1917, P. L. 102, by a garnishee from the order of the court below refusing to dissolve a foreign attachment in assumpsit.
After the rule to show cause why the attachment should not be dissolved had been argued, the court below permitted the plaintiff to amend his affidavit of cause of action. The garnishee, relying on the rule of practice established by the Supreme Court, when it bad nisi prius jurisdiction (Eldridge v. Robinson, 4 S. & R. 548), that supplemental affidavits would not be received, assigns this order of the court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marano v. GranataSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Cicco v. Wiltshire, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1934
- David v. David, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1930