Legal Opinion

In re Collins

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

I must deny the motion for a new hearing herein. I am not entirely satisfied that, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, the respondent’s attorney might not, before trial, have discovered the evidence upon which he now relies. And, besides, he does not present the affidavits of the persons from whom he expects the additional testimony or show why he has failed so to do. This circumstance is of itself fatal to his application (Shumway v. Fowler, 4 *287Johns., 425; Denn v. Morrell, 1 Hall, 382; Sheppard v. Sheppard, 5 Hals., 250; Smith v. Cushing, 18 Wisc., 295; Gould v. Moore, 40…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Shumway v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Denn ex dem. Hughs v. MorrellThe Superior Court of New York City · 1828
  4. Cowan v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Bright v. Wilson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Mayer's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API