Legal Opinion

Pope v. Burgess

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Conceding that survivorship may be annexed to a tenancy in common by adequate contract inter sese of the co-owners, and that the Act of 1184, now G.S. 41-2, abolishing survivorship incident upon joint tenancy by operation of law, does not bar or affect such action, we are then brought to the question whether the exhibited contract between the parties is adequate to accomplish that result.

We may eliminate from consideration the deed of the administrator, made under the supposed authority of the contract, as neither aiding nor vitiating its effect, and treat it as mere separable surplusage.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waller v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Scott v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Doe Ex Dem. Cobb v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Doe Ex Dem. Armfield v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
  5. Doe ex dem. Shackelford v. Planters' & Merchants' Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Holohan v. MelvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. NEW HOME BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY v. NationsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Flinn v. Van DevereDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. McLamb v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API