Legal Opinion
Ehrlich v. Johnson Service Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 31, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
These are actions of contract for the recovery of preferences brought by the trustee in bankruptcy of The Hampden Plumbing and Heating Company. The cases were submitted to a judge of the Superior Court on an agreed statement of facts, and in each case there was a finding for the defendant. Judgments were entered for the defendants and the plaintiff appealed.
It is agreed that in May, 1925, The Hampden Plumbing *387and Heating Company, hereinafter called the company, entered into an agreement with the New York Central Railroad Company, hereinafter called the railroad, pursuant to which the company…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sexton v. Kessler & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Canter v. SchlagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Central Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Framingham Trust Company v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc., American Casualty Company v. Framingham Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Ballentine v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Van Dusen Aircraft Supplies of New England, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.