State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Weinstein
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
*781HYDE, Judge.
Prohibition to prevent respondent from proceeding in a case entitled St. Louis County Water Company v. State Highway Commission in which the Water Company seeks review in the Circuit Court of St. Louis Cdunty, under the provisions of Chapter 536, particularly Secs. 536.100 and 536.110 (statutory references are to RSMo and V.A.M.S.) of an order of the Commission directing relocation of its water mains on state owned highway right of way at its own expense. The question for decision is whether these and other provisions of the Administrative Procedure and Review Act (hereinafter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Wood v. Wagner Electric CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Leggett v. JensenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Koplar v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State Ex Rel. McNary v. HaisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Missourians for Separation of Church & State v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Percy Kent Bag Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- In Re Village of Lone JackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.