Matter of Randolph
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
101 N.J. 425 (1986)
502 A.2d 533
IN THE MATTER OF NORMA RANDOLPH.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 10, 1984.
Decided January 7, 1986.
Robert J. Hrebek argued the cause for appellant, Monmouth County Sheriff, William M. Lanzaro.
Frederic S. Kessler argued the cause for Norma Randolph (Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).
Barbara A. Harned, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Judiciary (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Arthur Penn submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae, the National…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.