Legal Opinion
Young v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1979No. 77-1606PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
The issue here is whether the trial court erred in holding that a policy of life insurance issued to one Thomas Alexander Young by Fidelity Union Life Insurance *706Company had lapsed for non-payment of premiums prior to Young’s death. We hold that the trial court did not err, and we therefore affirm.
Charlotte Meier Young, in her own name and as a so-called “assignee in trust” for two minor sons, brought the present action against Fidelity Union on a policy of life insurance issued to another son, Thomas Alexander Young. The latter was shot and killed by a robber on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hercules Casualty Insurance Company v. Preferred Risk Insurance Company, Sue Walters, Wein T. Lee, and Larry Jackson CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Unigard Insurance Company v. John Michael Studer and Countryside Casualty Company, and Edna Landrum and William LandrumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979