Grohman v. Weiss

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Steven Weiss appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated March 11, 1996, which denied his motion to set aside a foreclosure sale on the ground that his attorney was not served with notice of the sale pursuant to CPLR 2103, and (2) an order of the same court, dated July 30, 1996, which denied his motion, denominated as a motion for renewal and reargument, which was, in actuality, for reargument.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the brief filed by the proposed intervenors-purchasers is stricken (see, 22…