Legal Opinion

Kelly v. National Attorneys Title Assurance Fund

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2011No. 69A04-1104-CT-215Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Charles David Kelly appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of National Attorneys Title Assurance Fund (“National”). Kelly raises two issues for our review, but we address only the following dispositive issue: whether Kelly breached his seller’s warranty when he conveyed title to real property that was encumbered by a federal tax lien. We hold that the undisputed facts support the entry of summary judgment for National and, as such, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The following facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. United States v. Estate of RomaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Tom-Wat, Inc. v. FinkIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. United States v. Donahue Industries, Inc., Dba Donahue Printing Company, and Rainier National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API