Legal Opinion

Front, Inc. v. Khalil

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2015PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Abdus-Salaam, J.

This appeal requires this Court to answer the open question of whether statements made by attorneys prior to the commencement of litigation are privileged. We hold that such statements are protected by a qualified privilege. If the statements are pertinent to a good faith anticipated litigation, no cause of action for defamation can be based on those statements.

I

Defendant/third-party plaintiff Philip Khalil was employed as director of engineering for plaintiff Front, Inc. (Front), an American architectural and engineering design and consulting firm, from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Wiener v. WeintraubNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Rosenberg v. MetLife, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Sexter & Warmflash, P.C. v. MargrabeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Brown v. Maxwell Dershowitz v. GiuffreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Schroeder v. Pinterest Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Stega v. New York Downtown Hosp.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Bar Group, LLC v. Business Intelligence Advisors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  5. Cline v. Reetz-LaioloDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API