Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Fink

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1987No. 86-511Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

483 U.S. 89 (1987)

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

v.

FINK ET AL.

No. 86-511.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 27, 1987

Decided June 22, 1987

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Alan I. Horowitz argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Olsen, Deputy Solicitor General Lauber, and Jonathan S. Cohen.

Matthew J. Zinn argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Susan H. Serling, J. Walker Johnson, W. Merritt Jones, Jr., and Mark K. Wilson.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · PowellJustice Powell

The question in this case is…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API