Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. United States (In re Mitchell)

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 16, 1990No. Bankruptcy No. 87-01176; Adv. No. A87-06711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

SAMUEL J. STEINER, Chief Judge.

The United States has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s conclusion that under Section 6701 of the Internal Revenue Code the appropriate penalty to be assessed against Mitchell for his involvement in the preparation and/or approval of the false tax return of Cascade Hydro for the year 1985 is $10,000. 109 B.R. 434. The Government maintains that the penalty should be $1,000 per shareholder, that is a total of $34,000.

Cascade Hydro is a Subchapter S corporation. The Government argues that a distinction must be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kuchan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. Mitchell v. United States (In Re Mitchell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re James E. Mitchell and Diane C. Mitchell, Debtors. James E. Mitchell Diane C. Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Martin A. Kapp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
  3. Cheshire v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API