Legal Opinion

Estes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1984No. 67673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

This case is a companion to Brooks v. State, 169 Ga. App. 543 (-SE2d-) (1984). Like Brooks, Michael A. Estes appeals from his conviction of two counts of first degree forgery.

1. Appellant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict because the state did not offer evidence of absence of authority to sign the allegedly forged money orders. A review of the transcript indicates that all of the elements of the crime were proved by the state. Under OCGA § 16-9-1 (Code Ann. § 26-1701), “[a] person commits the offense of forgery in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. High v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Mobley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API