Eisenhut v. Steadman
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Royse, J.:
This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Following trial, the district court entered judgment for the contractors. The owner of the property appeals, contending the court erred in finding the mechanic’s lien was timely filed and denying credit for construction costs that remain unpaid. We affirm.
John Eisenhut and Eric Hotzel (contractors) are carpenters who had formed a partnership. They contracted with Nellie Steadman to do some remodeling work at her home. When the work was completed, Steadman refused to pay the contractors. Instead, Steadman provided them with a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas Department of Revenue v. Coca Cola Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Williams Telecommunications Co. v. GraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Rural Water District No. 6 v. Ziegler Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Benner-Williams, Inc. v. RomineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Stickney v. Murdock Steel & Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Fletcher v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Moyer v. Allen Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- In Re Estate of WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.