Commonwealth v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceRoberts, Justice
I agree with the majority that because appellant did not object to the trial court’s procedure for reconstructing the transcript, he may not on appeal raise as error the trial court’s alleged failure to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 1923. Nonetheless, I think it worthwhile to point out that an appellant has a constitutional right to a transcript or an equivalent “picture” of the proceedings. Commonwealth v. Fields, 478 Pa. 479, 387 A.2d 83 (1978); Commonwealth v. Shields, 477 Pa. 105, 383 A.2d 844 (1978); Commonwealth v. Goldsmith, 452 Pa. 22, 304 A.2d 478 (1973); Commonwealth v. Norman, 447 Pa. 515,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DeSimoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.