Legal Opinion

Owen v. Blumenthal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

A motion for summary judgment has been granted, and a referee appointed and directed to take testimony and report, not only in connection with taking and stating the accounts, but “ to ascertain and report concerning all of the acts or omissions of the defendants * * *, which acts or omissions may have affected the failure to receive more, or may have caused a diminution, of the funds and securities now held by the said defendants * * In so far as an accounting is based upon wrongdoing thus alleged, it may not be had unless such wrong doing is first established. (New York, P. & B. R. R. Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osgood v. FranklinNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
  2. Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Franklin v. OsgoodCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1817
  4. N.Y., P. B.R.R. Co. v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Jackson v. AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of ReckfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re GlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Bon Temps Agency, Ltd. v. HickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Irving Trust Co. v. McKeeverDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API