Legal Opinion

Roadman v. Traeger

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1935No. Civ. No. 9269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

The appellants are sureties on a bond given to secure the release of a bank account attached in an action previously brought by Associated Sales Company, Inc., a corporation, and this action was brought to recover the amount of the judgment subsequently rendered in its favor. On appeal from the judgment rendered against them, appellants present two points: First, that the complaint does not allege nor did the trial court find that any demand was ever made upon them for pay*750ment; and second, that plaintiff cannot recover without showing that the claim had been assigned to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Parrott v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Ashton v. Dashaway Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Engelman v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Marsh Wall Products, Inc. v. Henry Marcus Building SpecialtiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API