Bergansky v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. With the further passage of time because this matter has been pending in litigation, petitioner may now be able to satisfy the Authority of his rehabilitation and to persuade it that an automatic debarment by reason of his criminal record is not appropriate. Hence, this determination is without prejudice to renewal by him of his application for permission to be employed in licensed premises. While the granting of permission remains in the discretion of the Authority, elemental fairness suggests that the period and depth of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Malverty v. Waterfront CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- United States v. Vincent Anthony MagdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Vincent Anthony MagdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976