Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 12, 1988No. 2571PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant, the Commonwealth, appeals from the trial court’s order granting a new trial to appellee, Gregory Stewart. The Commonwealth claims that the trial court erred in finding that defense counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to present a defense at trial based upon a psychiatric disorder which was triggered by Stewart’s drunken state at the time of the offense; and (2) failing to present evidence of Stewart’s good character. We agree with the Commonwealth’s contentions that trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance and, accordingly, we reverse the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. ByronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DeMossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Com. v. Baral, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Hines, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API