Legal Opinion

Smith v. Surtees

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 7, 1940No. 10746PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Marshall Sur-tees against Elijah Smith seeking to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him to his character and reputation as a result of Smith’s writing to J. L. Lytle Company the following postal card, to-wit: “4-22-38. Gentlemen: I understand that a certain Marshall Surtees collected quite a bit of hail insurance lately. .If your company was the victim it would be well for them to contact residents of that section to determine if hail or the high winds for 48 hours were the cause of damage. (Signed) A friend.”

Judgment was rendered in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rio Grande, E. P. & S. F. R. v. DupreeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Abbott v. AndrewsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Texas Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Pure Foods Products, Inc. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Pueblo v. Rodríguez HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. People v. Rodríguez HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API