Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gorbach v. Reno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2000No. 98-35723Published

1Concurrence

THOMAS, Circuit Judge,

with whom Judges BROWNING, T.G. NELSON, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA join, concurring:

I agree that the preliminary injunction should be affirmed. I write separately because I believe that when we review an administrative agency’s construction of the statute it administers, the proper analytical framework is dictated by Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-45, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), as recently explained in Food and Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1291, 146 L.Ed.2d 121…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API