Legal Opinion
Sephus v. Gozelski
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided April 29, 1987No. 83-2606-CivPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTAINING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ARONOVITZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE was heard in a non-jury trial on April 2 and 3, 1987. The Court received exhibits, heard testimony from both expert and lay witnesses, and the arguments of respective counsel, and having carefully considered all of the evidence, pertinent portions of the record, and the applicable law, the Court enters herein its Memorandum Opinion Containing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
The Nature of the Action
This is a third party action challenging the processes by which Third Party…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Michaels v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. City of ClarksdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bernard Sephus and George Lafleche v. Peter Gozelski, Elijah Hunter, Defendants-Third Party Robert M. Hustead, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989