Legal Opinion

Kluger v. Gallett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1970No. 41968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The sole issue of substance in this appeal is the interpretation and application of the Civil Damage Act. Minn. St. 340.95 provides :

“Every * * * person who is injured in person or property * * * by any intoxicated person * * * has a right of action, in his own name, against any person who, by illegally selling, bartering or giving intoxicating liquors, caused the intoxication of such person, for all damages, sustained * *

On the evening of July 28, 1967, defendant Daniel L. Gallett, then a 24-year-old college student, was a patron on the premises of defendant Thorndike Cafe,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mjos Ex Rel. Mjos v. Village of Howard LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jaros v. Warroad Municipal Liquor StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Marting v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cameron v. City of FridleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Jaros v. Warroad Municipal Liquor StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Jaros v. Warroad Municipal Liquor StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API