Legal Opinion
Friends of Magurrewock, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 11, 2007No. CV-07-48-B-WPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Friends of Magurrewock, Inc. (FOM) seeks to protect the Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge (MNWR) 1 from the future development that they fear will be the inevitable result of the ongoing construction of a nearby third bridge from Canada into eastern Maine. The Court denies FOM’s motion for preliminary injunction primarily because it concludes that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) was not acting arbitrarily and capriciously in its assessment of the practicality of alternatives, in its determination that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- L.L. Bean, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015