Rose v. Township Board
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. — Hon. W. W. Bucher, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, P. J.
Plaintiffs sought and obtained a temporary, injunction to restrain defendants, among whom were the township board (which board had ordered a certain road to be opened), from opening such Toad.
On coming in of their answer, defendants moved to dissolve the temporary injunction, which motion was granted and plaintiffs have appealed to this court.
Omitting caption, the judgment, so far as necessary to quote it, is the following: “That the plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief prayed for, that the injunction formerly granted in this cause to prevent the defendants, his (sic) servants and agents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Witthaus v. Washington Savings BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Johnson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Tanner v. IrwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1821
- Richards v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perseverance Common School District No. 90 v. HoneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- State ex rel. Manning v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Cohen v. BrummetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kupke v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906