Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manitowoc Public Schools Self-Insured v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2003No. 01-2911Published

1DissentWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 58. (dissen-, ting). The majority holding in this case, authored by Chief Justice Abrahamson, is that the Finnegans' claim does not fit within the third factor in Bowen. I disagree and will address this issue first. The lead opinion, authored by Justice Sykes, concludes that the Finne-gans' claim is not permissible under chapter 655 because it is not derivative. I disagree and will address this issue second.

I

¶ 59. The majority holding, which concludes that Bowen does not permit recovery in this case, is simply wrong. The majority holding does not, because it cannot, articulate a principled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shockley Ex Rel. Shockley v. PrierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fitzgerald v. Meissner & Hicks, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Giese v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. White v. LunderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API