Legal Opinion

Porter v. Mad Bear

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1956No. File 9583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The single question raised by this appeal which merits our consideration is whether the plaintiff was without legal capacity to bring the action.

To provide a sufficient background for our decision, we briefly outline a portion of the facts developed at the trial.

Robert Francis Mad Bear, who operated a ranch near Wakpala, Corson county, died in May 1954. In June 1954 Gertrude Mad Bear, his widow, filed her petition in County Court of Corson County, for summary administration; she represented that his estate consisted of 21 cows, 21 calves, 1 yearling heifer, 1 bull and 8 horses, of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bottum v. KamenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re Smith's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re Guider's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re Requa's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S. v. LunningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BachandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Estate of Sedlacek v. Mount Marty Hospital Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Estate of Sedlacek v. Mount Marty Hospital Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kirsch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API