Legal Opinion

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Hill

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 18, 2014No. 1D13-3585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsterhaus, J.

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court properly dismissed a foreclosure action filed by the appellant. The trial court dismissed the case because appellant failed to “schedule the matter for non-jury trial,” despite the fact that appellant had actively prosecuted the case and filed a notice of trial readiness three weeks before the dismissal order. Because the rules of civil procedure and Florida Supreme Court precedent require courts, not parties, to fix trial dates, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to reinstate the cause of action and to set a trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Mikos v. Sarasota Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Fishe & Kleeman v. Aquarius Condo. Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Cabrera v. PAZOS, LARRINAGA & TAYLOR, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christina Conner v. John MoranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Doris Sheppard v. Bruce Barman and Maureen BarmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API