Legal Opinion

HARRY CROW & SON, INC. v. Industrial Comm.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1963PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

18 Wis.2d 436 (1963)

HARRY CROW & SON, INC., and another, Appellants,

v.

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 29, 1962.

January 8, 1963.

For the appellants there was a brief by Kluwin, Dunphy, Hankin & Hayes of Milwaukee, and oral argument by John A. Kluwin.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Beatrice Lampert, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was John W. Reynolds, attorney general.

WILKIE, J.

The sole issue to be determined on this appeal is whether Norbert Crow was, as the Industrial Commission expressly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Scholz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lawson v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kress Packing Co. v. KottwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jaeger Baking Co. v. KretschmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API