Holmes v. . Marshall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action, for damages, tried before Buxton, J., at Fall Term, 1874, Stanly Superior Court. All the facts necessary to an understanding of the ease are set out in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRodmah, J.
On 6th July, 1871, certain persons conveyed to the plaintiff certain goods, the conversion of which by the defendant is the subject of the coinplaint, by a deed in trust to secure certain debts, owing by the grantors, to the plaintiff. The grantors, at the time of making the deed, resided in Stanly county, and the goods were then in that county. The deed was proved in due form before the Probate Judge of Rowan county, who certified thereto under his official seal, and was registered by the Register of Stanly county, on 5th of April, 1872, on said certificate, which had not been presented to,…
2Cited by16 opinions
- White v. . ConnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Tatom v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Westfelt v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Young v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.