McCaslin v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff purchased a ticket over defend-’
ant’s road from Lansing to Dimondale. She occupied a *554seat a little back from the center of the car. As the train approached Dimondale, the station was called by the brakeman. Plaintiff arose from her seat before the cars stopped. Two passengers, Mr. and Mrs. Stiles, sat near her. Dimondale is a small place, and there were more passengers for that place than usual. There was no specified time for the stoppage of the train, but it was, of course, required to stop long enough to permit passengers to get off and on. Three passengers, including Mr. and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jeffersonville Railroad v. Hendricks' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BangsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Strand v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. MulvaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Hanson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Clement v. Crosby & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.