Legal Opinion

Jernigan v. Niblock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 20, 1976No. 76-249PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elsijane T. Roy, Justice.

Appellees instituted this action to enjoin the Secretary of State from certifying to the appropriate election officials Proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 58. Thereafter the Arkansas Medical Society was granted permission to intervene as party-defendant.

Appellees contend inter alia that House Joint Resolution No. 17 (H.J.R. No. 17) was not passed with the formalities required by Article 19, § 22 of the Arkansas Constitution. The trial court agreed with appellees and held that the House and Senate had adopted different versions of H.J.R. No. 17 and that the popular…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Collier v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  2. Rice v. PalmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. McAdams v. HenleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Smithee v. GarthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  5. Butler v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API