In re M.W.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 29} Because I believe that the majority’s holding offends the United States Supreme Court’s constitutional commands on a juvenile’s due process and Fifth Amendment rights, our own precedent, and the intent of the General Assembly in enacting R.C. 2151.352,1 must dissent.
The Confession
{¶ 30} In 2009, M.W., a 15-year-old boy, acted as a lookout while his friend, another juvenile male, robbed a victim at gunpoint. We believe this to be true because soon thereafter, M.W. admitted those facts to Cleveland Police.
*317{¶ 31} M.W. confessed after signing a waiver of his rights to an attorney, without…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.