Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 29, 2010No. 08-0719/CGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ERDMANN, Judge, with whom EFFRON, Chief Judge,

joins (concurring in part and dissenting in part):

While I concur with the majority opinion as to the jurisdictional issue raised by the Government, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion as to the granted issue. In a case where credibility of the complainant was fundamental, the military judge prevented the defense from presenting to the panel an explanation of the circumstances that would have provided a motive for the complainant to make a false allegation of rape.

Background

Cadet Webster Smith was initially charged with twenty-two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. BinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API