United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
ERDMANN, Judge, with whom EFFRON, Chief Judge,
joins (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
While I concur with the majority opinion as to the jurisdictional issue raised by the Government, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion as to the granted issue. In a case where credibility of the complainant was fundamental, the military judge prevented the defense from presenting to the panel an explanation of the circumstances that would have provided a motive for the complainant to make a false allegation of rape.
Background
Cadet Webster Smith was initially charged with twenty-two…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. BinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.