Legal Opinion

Fritz v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1971No. 6-68-Civil-5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

This is an interpleader action. The original defendant National Surety Corporation has deposited $2,380 with the Court and admits the fund belongs to either Dolores Fritz (the plaintiff) or the United States (the interpleaded defendant). The fund represents retained wages and bonuses payable to James E. Fritz, plaintiff’s former husband, by reason of his employment with National Surety.

The parties have filed a 7-page stipulation of facts with 6 attached exhibits. Briefs have been lodged. The parties have waived oral argument.

Each party claims priority…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. ScovilSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PaladinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  2. Rodeck v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API