Fritz v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
This is an interpleader action. The original defendant National Surety Corporation has deposited $2,380 with the Court and admits the fund belongs to either Dolores Fritz (the plaintiff) or the United States (the interpleaded defendant). The fund represents retained wages and bonuses payable to James E. Fritz, plaintiff’s former husband, by reason of his employment with National Surety.
The parties have filed a 7-page stipulation of facts with 6 attached exhibits. Briefs have been lodged. The parties have waived oral argument.
Each party claims priority…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. ScovilSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. PaladinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
- Rodeck v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988