Legal Opinion

Palm v. Palm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bovina, J.), dated January 8, 2004, as, after a hearing, awarded custody of the parties’ children to the father, and (2) from an order of the same court dated January 16, 2004, which dismissed her petition for custody.

Ordered that the order dated January 8, 2004, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated January 16, 2004, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Kuncman v. KuncmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luo v. YangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Falco v. DiForioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Falco v. DiForioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Gooler v. GoolerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Luo v. YangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API