Legal Opinion
Silverstein v. Goodman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 28, 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent Viola Goodman’s argument that Sklar’s account should have been rejected because it lacked documentary support is unavailing. It is true that Sklar’s April 2011 account was a mere spreadsheet, without back-up. However, Sklar submitted backup documentation in June and December 2011; thus, Goodman and her lawyer had ample time to review the documents before the March 2012 hearing before the Special Referee. Even now, Goodman does not point to any inaccuracy in Sklar’s account.
Goodman’s contention that Sklar’s commission should be less than the statutory maximum of 5% of sums received…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jakubowicz v. A.C. Green Electrical Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cohen v. Akabas & CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Chang v. ZapsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- David Realty & Funding, LLC v. Second Avenue Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Brookman & Brookman P.C. v. Joseph Fleischer Natural Coiffures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Freidman v. YakovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Community Counseling & Mediation Services v. CheraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Community Counseling & Mediation Services v. CheraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Document Security Systems, Inc. v. RonaldiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Fuks v. Rakia Assocs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.