Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. State ex rel. Atkinson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875Published

From the Blackford Circuit Court.

1DissentBuskiek, C. J.

I dissent from so much of the foregoing opinion as holds that the appellant became the surety of his co-administrator. He executed the bond as a principal, and not as a surety, and he cannot be held liable as a surety.

Besides, the bond cannot be regarded as a common law obligation, as it and its form are prescribed by statute. It is provided, by the nineteenth section of the act for the settlement of decedents’ estates, 2 G. & H. 489, that “ every person appointed executor, administrator with the will annexed, or administrator, before receiving letters, shall execute a separate bond, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caffrey v. DudgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Braxton v. State ex rel. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Prichard v. State ex rel. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API