Moore v. State ex rel. Atkinson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Blackford Circuit Court.
1DissentBuskiek, C. J.
I dissent from so much of the foregoing opinion as holds that the appellant became the surety of his co-administrator. He executed the bond as a principal, and not as a surety, and he cannot be held liable as a surety.
Besides, the bond cannot be regarded as a common law obligation, as it and its form are prescribed by statute. It is provided, by the nineteenth section of the act for the settlement of decedents’ estates, 2 G. & H. 489, that “ every person appointed executor, administrator with the will annexed, or administrator, before receiving letters, shall execute a separate bond, with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Caffrey v. DudgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Braxton v. State ex rel. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Prichard v. State ex rel. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870