Legal Opinion

Huey v. Hamilton-Carhartt Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 7, 1916No. 9444Published

Before MoorE, J., York, January, 1916. Action by Elizabeth Huey and others against the Hamilton Carhartt Cotton Mills. From order relative to amendment, bringing in as defendant Hamilton Carhartt, manufacturer, plaintiff and said Hamilton Carhartt, manufacturer, appeal. submits: Order affects questions■ not noticed, nor before the Court: 53 S. C. 111. Variance in name of parties: Code Civil Proc., sec. 224; 5 S. C. 288; 13 S. C. 491; 16 S. C. 231; 51 S. C. 412; 73 S. C. 477;…

Read the full summary

Before MoorE, J., York, January, 1916. Action by Elizabeth Huey and others against the Hamilton Carhartt Cotton Mills. From order relative to amendment, bringing in as defendant Hamilton Carhartt, manufacturer, plaintiff and said Hamilton Carhartt, manufacturer, appeal. submits: Order affects questions■ not noticed, nor before the Court: 53 S. C. 111. Variance in name of parties: Code Civil Proc., sec. 224; 5 S. C. 288; 13 S. C. 491; 16 S. C. 231; 51 S. C. 412; 73 S. C. 477; 83 S. C. 557;.76 S. C. 189; 96 S. C. 19, 22. As to amendment: 90 S. C. 278; 81 S. C. 44; 103 S. C. 177. Messrs. Wilson…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This appeal is based upon an order allowing an amendment to a summons and complaint. The following is the order:

“Notice of said motion to amend was .served, by mail, upon Messrs. Wilson & Wilson, and by personal service upon W. G. Henderson. Mr. W. B. Wilson, Jr., appeared for Hamilton Carhartt, manufacturer, and stated at the hearing that such appearance was to the jurisdiction of the Court and without prejudice. After hearing arguments of the attorneys:
“(1) It is ordered that the summons and complaint be amended by inserting the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Citizens Savings Bank v. EfirdSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API