Feinstein v. Welischedk
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 268, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1913, Sheriff’s Interpleader, No. 3,318, on verdict for plaintiff in case of M. Feinstein v. John Welischeek. Issue on sheriff’s interpleader.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 268, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1913, Sheriff’s Interpleader, No. 3,318, on verdict for plaintiff in case of M. Feinstein v. John Welischeek. Issue on sheriff’s interpleader. Before Dougherty, J. At the trial it appeared that M. Feinstein claimed' title to certain of the goods levied upon the ground that he had leased them to M. Fishman, the defendant in the execution, and that by reason of default under the terms of the lease he was entitled to their possession. He filed a bond which covered double the appraised value of all…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kephart, J.,
The sheriff, under a fieri facias, levied upon all the goods in the possession of the execution debtor. A part of these goods were claimed by the plaintiff, who filed with the sheriff a notice as required by law. Upon payment by him of the requisite fee the sheriff caused an appraisement to be made of all the goods levied upon. The plaintiff filed his statement of claim and bond, which, with the notice of claim of property served on the sheriff, enumerated just what goods the plaintiff claimed. The bond, however, was in double the amount of the appraised value of all the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bricker v. DoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916