Legal Opinion

Bowdoin v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 24, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Indictment for fornication. Before Judge Gober. Gordon superior court. June 6, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtIFish, J.

1. That the judge, during the trial of a misdemeanor ease, and while the evidence was being submitted, in the presence of and without objection from counsel for the accused, allowed the jury to disperse during a night recess, is not, after a verdict of guilty, cause for a new trial, when there is no evidence of any attempt to influence the jury, or of any improper conduct on their part. See Eberhart v. State, 47 Ga. 598(5); Carter v. State, 56 Ga. 467 (4); Kirk v. State, 73 Ga. 620 (3); Riggins v. Brown, 12 Ga. 271 (10); Adkins v. Williams, 23 Ga. 222 (3); Stix v. Pump, 37 Ga. 332, (3);…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eberhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  3. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Vann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Story v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API