Legal Opinion
Payton v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 22, 1993No. Civ. No. 1:90-cv-2451-JECPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARNES, District Judge.
This case is presently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend [26], Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Time for Discovery [29], Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [30], Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend [31], and Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order [43]. The Court has reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and, for the reasons set out below, concludes that both motions for protective orders should be granted and all other motions denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, Kim Payton and Bryan McGil-ton, brought this action in the Superior…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Susie J. Salter, as of the Estate of Salter, Rufus, Deceased v. The Upjohn Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Farquhar v. SheldenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morin v. Nationwide Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Doyle v. Hoyle Ins.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- Lujan and Gill v. TeboSuperior Court of Guam · 2019