Legal Opinion

Shipley v. Cooney & Conway Creditors (In re C.P. Hall Co.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 12, 2014No. Bankruptcy No. 11 B 26443; Adversary Nos. 13 A 1070, 13 A 1156PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A. BENJAMIN GOLDGAR, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the court for ruling are motions by two groups of creditors, each group a defendant in separate adversary proceedings, to dismiss the adversary proceedings for insufficient process and insufficient service of process under Rules 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(4), (5) (made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7012(b)). As the creditors correctly argue, the captions of the complaints as well as the summonses violate the rules and are insufficient. The complaints will therefore be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Sealed v. Sealed 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Trackwell v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Samuel H. Myles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shipley v. Abrams (In re C.P. Hall Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API