Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jones v. O'Farrel, James & Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe Eourtli Judicial District, State of Nevada, "Washoe County, Hon. C. C. Goodwin presiding. Tbe facts of tbe case are stated in the opinion of tbe Court. Tbe counsel on both sides filed elaborate briefs, but as they discuss rather tbe evidence than tbe principles of law involved, no abstract can be made from them that will elucidate' tbe principles settled in this decision.

1Concurrence

*355Opinion of tbe Court by Justice

Beatty, Justice BeosNAN

concurring.

Chief Justice Lewis, having been counsel in the Court below, did not participate in the hearing.

This was an action brought against Jasper O’Earrel, John James, William H. James, James Hill, J. W. Farrington and E. A. Mier, alleged to be members of and composing the firm of “ O’Earrel, James & Co.,” to recover the amount of a note executed by that firm, and also an account for articles furnished and charged to the same firm.

There was no defense made by any of the defendants except William H. James and James Hill. They each of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLeod v. LeeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  3. Trustees of the Carpenters for Southern Nevada Health & Welfare Trust v. Better Building Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Trustees of the Carpenters for Southern Nevada Health & Welfare Trust v. Better Building Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API