Henry Chanin Corporation v. Dumas
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
This case is here for review on two assignments •of error-,; first, because of the ruling on objections made to a question propounded on cross-examination by counsel for the defendant in error to a witness for the plaintiffs in error, and second, because the verdict was excessive. The assignments on the general grounds are abandoned.
1.. As a basis for the first assignment the record reveals the following incident which we set forth after stating the case-: J. C. Dumas Jr. filed a suit for damages on account of alleged personal injuries sustained by him by reason of the collision of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Heinz v. BackusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Linder v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burnette v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984