Legal Opinion

Reese v. Schneider

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

The third-party defendant insurance company, hereinafter referred to as the insurance company, moves for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, wherein it is alleged among other things that the third-party plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the husband, was an *277insured under an automobile liability policy, originally issued to his wife, by virtue of the fact that the insurance company’s agent had agreed with the husband’s insurance broker, who was also the wife’s brother, to indorse the policy so as to add the husband as a named insured and to substitute in place of the auto…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Drennan Ex Rel. Drennan v. Sun Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Smaldone v. President of the Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muslin v. Frelinghuysen Livestock ManAgers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Muslin v. Frelinghuysen Livestock Managers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Cupid Diaper Service Corp. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API