Legal Opinion
Paldo Sign and Display Company v. Wagener Equities, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 16, 2016No. 15-1267PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Paldo Sign and Display Company (“Pal-do Sign”) filed suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), against Wagener Equities, Inc. and Daniel Wagener, seeking statutory damages after Paldo Sign received an unsolicited facsimile advertisement promoting Wagener Equities’ services. After the district court certified a class of more than ten thousand plaintiffs who had received the offending ad, a jury returned a special verdict finding that Wagener Equities had not “authorized the fax broadcast transmission,” and that Daniel Wagener…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Everroad v. Scott Truck Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Shaquille Griffin v. Richard BellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Bridgeview Health Care Center v. Jerry ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jakeffe HoltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Brian LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Helping Hand Caregivers, Ltd. v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Practice Mgmt. Support Servs., Inc. v. Cirque Du Soleil, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Nicholas P. Marrocco v. Funds in the Amount of One HunCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Karahodzic v. JBS Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Bais Yaakov v. Eductl. Testing ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.