Legal Opinion
Donald James Schnepp v. State of Oregon and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1964No. 19119PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
The j'udgment dismissing the application of Donald James Schnepp for a writ of habeas corpus to obtain his release from Oregon State Penitentiary is affirmed for the following reasons:
1. The warden of Oregon State Penitentiary was not named a respondent. See Goss v. State of Alaska, 9 Cir., 325 F.2d 1019; Bohm v. State of Alaska, 9 Cir., 320 F.2d 851.
2. According to allegations contained in the application, Schnepp now has a post conviction proceeding pending in the courts of Oregon, and therefore has not exhausted his presently-available state remedies, this being a condition precedent to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Robert H. Bohm v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Limmie West, III v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Limmie West, III v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- (HC) Hundal v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Lambert v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Armando Lopez v. Stu ShermanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.